Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting Reform

Woods, Michael

Journal: Florida Law Review

Volume: 68

First Page: 1509

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 68 FLA. L. REV. 1509 (2016)

Author: M. Evelyn Woods: all 4 publications


Abstract

This Comment discusses how the Arizona State Legislature majority reached its decision to uphold independent redistricting commissions, addresses issues that several of the dissenters raised, and analyzes how the decision will impact partisan gerrymandering and future redistricting reform. Part I briefly overviews reapportionment, gerrymandering, and redistricting reform. Part II then examines Arizona State Legislature and provides the legal and political context for the nearly five-year debate over the AIRC. Finally, Part III explores potential legal and policy ramifications of the decision on the future of partisan gerrymandering and redistricting reform.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.