Generally Applicable Law and the Free Exercise of Religion
Laycock, Douglas & Collis, Steven T.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by5
- 2023Pleasant View Baptist Church v. Andy Beshear 6th Cir.
- 2022M.A. v. Rockland County Department of Health 2d Cir.
- 2020Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak U.S.
- 2020Rev. Steven Soos v. Cuomo N.D.N.Y.
- 2020Danville Christian Academy, Inc. v. Beshear SCOTUS
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
I. Introduction II. Free Exercise of Religion in the Age of Smith III. Two Requirements with Distinct Content ... A. Neutrality ... B. General Applicability IV. Elaborating General Applicability ... A. Arguments for Minimizing the Requirement of General Applicability: Stormans v. Wiesman ... B. Reasonable Exceptions ... C. Circular Categories and Circular Government Interests ... D. Secular Exceptions Not Stated in the Law’s Text ... E. Rules That Apply to Most but Not All Analogous Secular Conduct ... F. Laws with a Single Secular Exception That Undermines the State’s Interests V. Underlying Reasons ... A. Value Judgments about Religion ... B. Vicarious Political Protection for Religious Minorities ... C. The Level of Protection VI. Conclusion