Future Interests - Restraints on Alienation - Same Rules Applicable to Restraints on Future and Possessory Interests

Relyea S.Ed., Chester F.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 52

First Page: 616

Year: 1954

Bluebook Citation: 52 MICH. L. REV. 616 (1954)

Author: Chester F. Relyea S Ed: all 4 publications


Abstract

Testator devised real estate to his wife for life, remainder to his children, "with the following understanding," that should any child attempt to dispose of his interest before the death of the testator's wife, that child would forfeit his share and it would go to the remaining children. After the death of the testator, but before the death of his widow, one son conveyed away his interest in the property. In a suit for the partition of the real estate devised by the testator; held, on appeal, restraints on the alienation of vested estates in fee simple are against public policy and are therefore void. The conveyance by the son was effective.

Andrews v. Hall, 156 Neb. 817, 58 N.W. (2d) 201 (1953).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.