From Pillory to Penitentiary: The Rise of Criminal Incarceration in Early Massachusetts
Hirsch, Adam J.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by6
- 2021The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-Petitioner Colo.
- 2018In re Interest of T.H. Iowa
- 2018In the Interest of T.H., Minor Child Iowa
- 2010State v. Bowditch N.C.
- 2003Smith v. Doe U.S.
- 2000State v. Bollig Wis.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
While the transition from the old forms of criminal sanction to incarceration was perhaps not, as Jeremy Bentham claimed, "one of the most signal improvements that have ever yet been made in our criminal legislation," one does not overstate to call it a signal development in the history of Anglo-American criminal justice - a development, one may add, that still wants adequate examination, much less explanation. This Article attempts to do both for one sample region: Massachusetts. Though the jurisprudential movement from pillory to penitentiary took place throughout the new American republic, as well as much of western Europe, our limited focus presents a case study, and a jumping-off point for further research.