Free Exercise, the Respect for Marriage Act, and Some Potential Surprises

Strasser, Mark

Journal: Cleveland State Law Review

Volume: 72

First Page: 433

Year: 2024

Bluebook Citation: 72 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 433 (2024)

Author: Mark P. Strasser: all 96 publications


Abstract

Congress recently passed the Respect for Marriage Act to assure that certain marriages would remain valid even if the Supreme Court were to overrule past precedent and hold that the Constitution does not protect the right to marry a partner of the same sex or of a different race. However, the Act, as written, may not offer protection for certain same-sex or interracial marriages and may open the door to the federal protection of plural marriages, congressional intent notwithstanding, because of the Court’s increasingly robust free exercise jurisprudence.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.