First Amendment Antitrust: The End of Laissez-Faire in Campaign Finance

David Cole

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 9

First Page: 236

Year: 1991

Bluebook Citation: 9 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 236 (1991)

Author: David D. Cole: all 27 publications


Abstract

Judging from the rhetoric of the dissenting Justices, the Supreme Court's decision in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld limits on corporate campaign speech, marked a revolution in First Amendment jurisprudence. Justice Kennedy branded the majority a "censor," and characterized the result as "the most severe restriction on political speech ever sanctioned by this Court. " Justice Scalia warned that by accepting the majority's rationale, "the First Amendment will ultimately be brought down. But dissenters' rhetoric, like campaign speech itself, must be taken with a grain of salt.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.