FEDERAL ANTITRUST LEGISLATION: GUIDEPOSTS TO A REVISED NATIONAL ANTITRUST POLICY
Oppenheim, S. Chesterfield
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1967Beemer v. Solar Oil Co. Sussex N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 1960Federal Trade Commission v. Broch U.S.
- 1956United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. U.S.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The year 1952 finds various currents of controversy in the antitrust field converging toward the necessity for a survey and reappraisal of the body of congressional legislation generally known as the "federal antitrust laws." The foundation stone in the trio of principal antitrust statutes is the Sherman Act of 1890. Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Act of 1914, as amended, are the other two members of this major group of antimonopoly laws. While differing in particulars in its impact upon the American economy, each of these basic statutes is avowedly designed to maintain competition in American interstate and foreign commerce.