Fair Equivalents and Market Prices: Bankruptcy Cramdown Interest Rates
Markell, Bruce A.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Most recently cited by1
- 2026In re: Wisconsin & Milwaukee Hotel LLC Bankr. E.D. Wis.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Cramdown is the confirmation of a plan of reorganization over the dissent of an entire class of creditors. Bankruptcy's absolute priority rule permits such confirmation only if the dissenting class is paid in full, or if no junior class receives anything. 'Paid in full,' however, does not require payment in cash. It can consist of intangible promises to pay money that banks, investors, and markets regularly value. Whether this market value can precisely be transferred to cramdown has vexed many.
Recently, the debate has flared when a bankruptcy court applied a chapter 13 case, Till v. SCS Credit Corp., to cramdown confirmation in Momentive, a large chapter 11 case. Given the legislative history and precedents in the cramdown area, this Article takes the position that Momentive was correct, and that courts should resist using pure market-based valuations in cramdown calculations.