Extraterritorial Constitutionalism: A Rule Proposed, 50 J. Marshall L. Rev. 787 (2017)

Alfe, Joseph

Journal: UIC Law Review

Volume: 50

Year: 2017

Bluebook Citation: 50 UIC L. REV. (2017)

Author: Joseph C. Alfe: all 4 publications


Abstract

Does the Fourth Amendment apply in cases of cross-border shootings of foreign nationals, when those shots were fired by United States Border Patrol agents from American soil, striking a victim in Mexico? In oral argument, Petitioner failed to heed the trail of breadcrumbs strewn at his feet by inquisitive Supreme Court Justices. A workable, yet narrow rule that would plug the critically important gap in application of the United States Constitution to remedy such cross-border atrocities, was not articulated. I propose one here.

The world’s busiest border is that which is shared between the United States and Mexico. Our countries are intertwined economically and historically and have a shared cultural identity. Justice demands an answer in the affirmative; that the Constitution applies cross-border not only to remedy this young man’s death, but also to address inevitable future events.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.