"External" Versus "Internal" in International Law

Flaherty, Martin S.

Journal: Fordham International Law Journal

Volume: 29

First Page: 447

Year: 2005

Bluebook Citation: 29 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 447 (2005)

Author: Martin S. Flaherty: all 33 publications


Abstract

The issues and analyses in this issue of the Fordham International Law Journal provide excellent cases for testing how a conventional approach would mediate current external pressures for legal change on current international and foreign relations law commitments. As it turns out, the results suggest that sovereigntist concerns are overblown, but that internationalist advocates ignore them completely at their peril.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.