Exploring Methods to Improve Management and Fairness in Pro Se Cases: A Study of the Pro Se Docket in the Southern District of New York
Rosenbloom, Jonathan D.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 9% most-cited · cited by 54 decisions
54
Citing decisions
4
Courts citing
Citations by decade
19
35
2010s2020s
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by10
- 2022HADDEN v. LORMAN D.N.J.
- 2021WELCH v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON D.N.J.
- 2021WADE v. MILLS D.N.J.
- 2021LAWSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL DEPT. D.N.J.
- 2021TINEO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS D.N.J.
- 2021COLLINS v. TRUITT D.N.J.
- 2021SANKO v. LANIGAN D.N.J.
- 2021FREENY v. CAMDEN COUNTY D.N.J.
- 2021ROUNDTREE v. SANTIAGO D.N.J.
- 2021In Re: Marco Polo Capital Markets, LLC S.D.N.Y.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
This Article describes a study done in the Southern District of New York on pro se cases. Part I details the lack of current data and the methods used in the study. Part II provides the results of the study amd attempts to identify the areas of pro se litigation in which litigants are faced with the most problems and where improvement is needed. It also discusses the effects of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Part III suggests a plan that will help courts run more smoothly in assisting pro se litigants.