EVIDENCE-THE USE OF BLOOD GROUPING TESTS IN DISPUTED PARENTAGE PROCEEDINGS-A SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR DISCUSSION

Williams, Jr. S.Ed., Lewis R.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 50

First Page: 582

Year: 1952

Bluebook Citation: 50 MICH. L. REV. 582 (1952)

Author: Jr S. Ed Lewis R. Williams: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
2
1950s1970s

Courts citing this journal article

N.C.1
N.C. Ct. App.1
N.H.1
Most recently cited by3
  • 1974State v. Camp N.C. Ct. App.
  • 1970State v. Fowler N.C.
  • 1954Groulx v. Groulx N.H.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Much has been written concerning the validity of the so-called "blood-grouping tests" in bastardy and other legal proceedings. The general tenor of the writings is in favor of wider acceptance by the courts of the results of these tests. This comment is to be no exception. However, it is the purpose here to emphasize the scientific validity of the blood-grouping tests and to acquaint the reader with the theory upon which the tests rest.

If lawyers and judges understand the scientific basis of the tests, a more intelligent decision upon the validity of any given result can be formed, and the weight which should be given to the results of the tests can be more readily determined.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.