EVIDENCE-PRIVILEGE-RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON TO ASSERT PRIVILEGE AS TO ACCIDENT REPORT MADE CONFIDENTIAL BY STATUTE

Young S.Ed., Richard W.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 52

First Page: 1061

Year: 1954

Bluebook Citation: 52 MICH. L. REV. 1061 (1954)

Author: Richard W. Young S Ed: all 4 publications


Abstract

Plaintiff brought a negligence action for injuries sustained when the automobile in which she was a passenger collided with that operated by the defendant. Defendant questioned a police officer, who had filed the accident report, concerning statements made to him by the driver of the vehicle in which the plaintiff was riding. The trial court permitted this testimony over the plaintiff's objection that these statements were privileged under an Iowa statute purporting to make written accident reports confidential and inadmissible in evidence. On appeal after a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant, held, reversed.

The statute can be the basis for objection by one who is not a party to the report. The statutory prohibition of the accident report as evidence does more than create a personal privilege; it is not for the sole benefit of the party reporting but is for the benefit of the public at large. Sprague v. Brodus, (Iowa 1953) 60 N.W. (2d) 850.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.