EVIDENCE - HEARSAY RULE - USE OF "RES GESTAE"

Pitts, Henry L.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 37

First Page: 966

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 37 MICH. L. REV. 966 (1939)

Author: Henry L. Pitts: all 5 publications


Abstract

In an action on a life policy which acknowledged receipt of the first premium, the insurer-defendant claimed that no premium payment was made and that delivery was only to allow inspection and comparison with a specimen copy of the policy already in the hands of insured's wife. The district court admitted testimony by the insured's wife, the beneficiary and plaintiff in the action, to the effect that when the insured turned the policy over to her he said it was hers and paid for. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sustained the ruling and, on motion for rehearing, adhered to its original decision, stating that what the insured said about payment was properly admitted as res gestae of his possession of the policy. Yarbrough v. Prudential Ins.

Co. of America, (C. C. A. 5th; 1939) 100 F. (2d) 547.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.