EVIDENCE - EXCEPTIONS TO HEARSAY RULE - PHYSICIAN'S TESTIMONY AS TO STATEMENTS OF SYMPTOMS MADE BY PATIENT

Dewey, Benjamin H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 36

First Page: 142

Year: 1937

Bluebook Citation: 36 MICH. L. REV. 142 (1937)

Author: Benjamin H. Dewey: all 7 publications


Abstract

Plaintiff, while in the employ of the defendant, was injured when a ditch he was engaged in digging caved in upon him. Defendant alleged that the shock made active theretofore dormant pulmonary tuberculosis. He received treatment from a physician at the time of the injury. Upon plaintiff's suit under the Texas Workmen's Compensation Act, the physician was allowed to testify, over defendant's objection, that about a month and a half after the injury, the plaintiff had come to the physician's office, and reported that his sputum was stained with blood.

On appeal, it was held, one judge dissenting, that the statement was properly admitted. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Baugh, (C. C. A. 5th, 1936) 87 F. (2d) 240.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.