Equal Protection, Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences in Law Admissions: De Funis v. Odegaard
Morris, Arval A.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
- 1974Cathcart v. Andersen Wash. Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the constitutional dimensions of the equal protection problem presented by a law school's voluntary adoption of racial classifications in a preferential admissions policy, and to do so, in part, by focusing on the recent case of De Funis v. Odegaard.