Enforcement of Money Judgments in Early American History

Riesenfeld, Stefan A.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 71

First Page: 691

Year: 1973

Bluebook Citation: 71 MICH. L. REV. 691 (1973)

Author: Stefan A. Riesenfeld: all 88 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1973Wandschneider v. Bekeny N.Y. Sup. Ct.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The history of the enforcement of money judgments in the United States during the colonial period and the early days of statehood has never been explored in depth. The only modern account is the brief discussion in R. Millar's Civil Procedure of the Trial Court in Historical Perspective. Yet, in view of the recent and long overdue concern with the protection of debtors against unnecessarily harsh and oppressive direct collection remedies, a study of the early efforts designed to shield debtors from excessive and wasteful deprivations of their property is not without interest, especially as the record is rich in experimentation with different alleviating devices.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.