Eminent Domain and Water Law

Harnsberger, Richard S.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 325

Year: 1968

Bluebook Citation: 48 NEB. L. REV. 325 (1968)

Author: Richard S. Harnsberger: all 13 publications


Abstract

I. The Nature and Scope of the Eminent Domain Power … A. Introduction … B. Sources of Eminent Domain Power … C. Public Use … D. Necessity … E. Due Process Requirements, Compensation in Money, Procedural Points, and Consequential Damages II. Eminent Domain and Police Power … A. Distinguishing Compensable “Takings” from Noncompensable “Regulations” … B. Restriction or Taking … C. Impact of the Injury upon the Owner … D. Other Suggested Standards III. Private Undertakings as Public Uses … A. Introduction … B. Constitutional Provisions … C. Preferences … D. The Party Exercising the Power … E. Local Conditions IV. Municipal Water Supplies … A. Introduction … B. Effect of Local Doctrines … C. Value to Municipality V. Condemnation for Public Programs … A. Introduction … B. The Scope of the Commerce Power in Navigable Waters of the United States … C. Private Riparian Rights and the Navigation Servitude … D. "Takings" under the Navigation Servitude … E. Cutting Off the Riparian Owner’s Access to the Water … F. Injury to Riparian Property in the Stream Bed … G. Structure in Navigable Streams … H. Summary of Decisions Where Injuries Occur between the High Water Marks of a Navigable Stream … I. Background to the “River” Cases … J. The "River" Cases … K. Problems of Valuation … L. Miller Rule—Date of Commitment … M. The "Possibility of Combination" Rule and Values Attributable to Stream Flow … N. Effect of Federal Water Power Act on Private Rights … O. Noncompensability of Locational Value Attributable to Use of the Flow … P. The Twin City Dissent and the Decisions in the Grand River Dam Authority and the Vepco Cases … Q. Summary of Servitude Decisions Relating to Compensability … R. A Brief Critique of the Servitude Doctrine … S. Early English Law … T. Development of the Doctrine under Which the "Jus Publicum" Could Not Be Sold or Given Away by the King … U. Development of the Doctrine under Which the "Jus Privatum" Became Inalienable on the Part of the Crown … V. The Common Law Right of the Public to Navigate in Private Waters … W. Status of State Created Rights, Including Irrigation Diversion Works and consumptive Uses … X. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.