<em>Salix v. USFS</em>: When Is Agency Consultation Required Under the ESA?

Tafoya, Michelle

Journal: Montana Law Review Online

Volume: 75

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 75 MONT. L. REV. ONLINE (2014)

Author: Michelle Tafoya: all 4 publications


Abstract

Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has been called the “heart of the ESA” because it requires interagency consultation before undertaking actions that may harm endangered species. In Salix v. United States Forest Service, the United States District Court held the United States Forest Service (USFS) had to reinitiate consultation on a management plan amendment after the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) belatedly designated critical habitat for the Canada lynx. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit will address two other issues common to ESA challenges, standing and injunctive relief, in addition to the § 7 consultation requirement.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.