<em>Roe</em> as We Know It

Franklin, Cary

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 114

First Page: 867

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 114 MICH. L. REV. 867 (2016)

Author: Cary Franklin: all 6 publications


Abstract

The petitioners in last year’s historic same-sex marriage case cited most of the Supreme Court’s canonical substantive due process precedents. They argued that the right of same-sex couples to marry, like the right to use birth control and the right to guide the upbringing of one’s children, was among the liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court in Obergefell v. Hodges agreed, citing many of the same cases. Not once, however, did the petitioners or the majority in Obergefell cite the Court’s most famous substantive due process decision.

It was the dissenters in Obergefell who invoked Roe v. Wade.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.