<em>Masters Group Int'l, Inc. v. Comerica Bank</em>: Big Bank Loans, the Economic Crisis, Choice-of-law, Impleader, Statute of Frauds, Parol Evidence, Collusion, and the Constitutionality of Montana's Punitive Damages Statute . . . All Bundled into One Case!

Griffith, Paige

Journal: Montana Law Review Online

Volume: 75

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 75 MONT. L. REV. ONLINE (2014)

Author: Paige Griffith: all 4 publications


Abstract

Masters Group International, Inc. (Masters), Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellee, and Comerica Bank (Comerica), Third-Party Defendant and Appellant dispute over a contract. Comerica argues that a proposed forbearance agreement was not a valid contract and Comerica was not liable to Masters under the agreement. Masters urges the Court to adopt the district court’s determination of a valid contract, and uphold all jury awards.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.