Dueling Interpretations: The Conflict Arising from PTAB’s Use of Broadest Reasonable Interpretation for Claim Construction, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 134 (2016)

Martin, Andrew

Journal: UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Volume: 16

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 16 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2016)

Author: Andrew D. Martin: all 17 publications


Abstract

Claim Construction is the first hurdle in patent litigation to invalidate a patent. Traditionally, federal courts have interpreted claims in their plain and obvious meaning to a person skilled in the art. But a new avenue through post-grant proceedings at the patent office, such as inter-partes review, has created a worrying trend of increased patent invalidation. This comment will explore the consequences of the higher rate of invalidation, proposals suggested to solve the problem, and the actions of those who exploit it.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.