Donee Beneficiaries—Deckler v. Fowler

Shattuck, Warren L.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 14

First Page: 311

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 14 WASH. L. REV. 311 (1939)

Author: Warren L. Shattuck: all 29 publications


Abstract

A and B contract, A promising B to render at a future date some performance to C. What are the legal relations between A and C? B and C? A hundred years ago the answers to these questions would have required consideration of something called "privity of contract" and might well have been "no legal relations". Today, however, we can, on the basis of many decisions, say with certainty that in most states A owes a contract duty to C on breach of which C may have the usual remedies of a contract obligee.

In now accepted terminology C is a beneficiary of the A-B contract. The legal relations between B and C will vary according to B's purpose in procuring A's promise. If his purpose was to confer upon C a gratuity, C will be described as a donee beneficiary and B is a donor of the right which C acquires against A. If B's purpose was to have rendered to C a performance which will discharge a duty owed by B to C, although in a sense the recipient of a gratuity, C is usually referred to as a creditor beneficiary and for some purposes the previously existing debtor-creditor relationship between B and C is changed to one of surety-creditor, A being regarded as now the principal debtor. The following discussion will be limited to donee beneficiaries.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.