DOMA and the Internal Revenue Code

Cain, Patricia A.

Journal: Chicago-Kent Law Review

Volume: 84

First Page: 481

Year: 2009

Bluebook Citation: 84 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 481 (2009)

Author: Patricia A. Cain: all 18 publications


Abstract

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose under federal tax law. The primary justification for this rule is that tax benefits should be preserved for opposite-sex married couples. This article points out the absurdity of such a rule, given that tax law is not intended to privilege married couples, but instead is intended to measure their taxable income fairly on the basis of their status as related parties. The article then considers other justifications for applying DOMA to federal tax law and concludes that none of them meet minimal levels of rationality to support retaining the DOMA ban in the year 2009.

Because the justifications fail, DOMA, as applied to federal tax law, is unconstitutional.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.