DNA and <i>Daubert</i>

Scheck, Barry C.

Journal: Cardozo Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 1959

Year: 1994

Bluebook Citation: 15 CARDOZO L. REV. 1959 (1994)

Author: Barry C. Scheck: all 8 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2018Givens v. State Md. App. Ct.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The most intriguing aspect of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is that the Supreme Court never applied its new analytic framework for the admissibility of scientific evidence to the facts of the case. Either the deviltry, or the genius, of the Daubert decision lies in the details.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.