Distrust and Disclosure in Special Education Law

Kotler, Martin A.

Journal: Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003)

Volume: 119

First Page: 485

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 119 DICK. L. REV. 485 (2014)

Author: Martin A. Kotler: all 8 publications


Abstract

Although the IDEA purports to entitle disabled children to a "free, appropriate, public education" (FAPE), disagreements regarding the concept of "appropriateness" have been an ongoing source of conflict between parents and educators. While parents demand that school districts and other educational service providers program so as to maximize the child's potential, school personnel frequently insist that an educational program is "appropriate" within the meaning of the Act if it permits a child to make any progress at all. This Article proposes a middle ground under which the "appropriateness" of a program is to be judged on an individualized basis taking into consideration each child's potential for educational growth. Additionally, based on personal experience gained in years of litigation with schools over the appropriateness of special education programs and services, many of the common abuses of the system established by the IDEA are identified and changes are suggested.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.