Discretion, Rules, and Law: Child Custody and the UMDA's Best-Interest Standard

Schneider, Carl E.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 89

First Page: 2215

Year: 1991

Bluebook Citation: 89 MICH. L. REV. 2215 (1991)

Author: Carl E. Schneider: all 29 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1999Gorski v. Ragains Tenn. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

One barrier facing any attempt to devise a uniform law for diverse jurisdictions is the occasional - perhaps even frequent - difficulty of writing rules that will accurately guide judges. The law's ordinary solution to that difficulty is to give judges some measure of discretion. This article inquires into the nature and legitimacy of that technique. It does so by analyzing a particularly controversial provision of the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA).

Section 402 of that Act states: "The court shall determine custody in accordance with the best interest of the child." It then instructs the court to "consider all relevant factors," including the parents' wishes, the child's wishes, the child's relationships with the significant people in his life, the child's "adjustment to his home, school, and community," and "the mental and physical health of all individuals involved."

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.