Discouraging Election Contests

Douglas, Joshua A.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 47

First Page: 1015

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 47 U. RICH. L. REV. 1015 (2013)

Author: J. Allen Douglas: all 23 publications


Abstract

This essay proceeds in three sections. Section I lays the founda- tion for why our system encourages-or at least does not dis-suade-the filing of post-election contests in close races. Section II posits that election contests are often bad for our democracy, explaining why post-election litigation might harm the ideals of finality, certainty, and legitimacy in the election process. SectionIII sets out three structural reforms that might make losing candidates think twice before initiating an election contest.

Ultimately, the goal of this essay is to promote a broader discussion of the propriety of post-election litigation and what we can do to curtail it.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.