Disarmed by Time: The Second Amendment and the Failure of Originalism

Farber, Daniel A.

Journal: Chicago-Kent Law Review

Volume: 76

First Page: 167

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 76 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 167 (2000)

Author: Daniel A. Farber: all 158 publications


Abstract

Originalism provides the core arguments for an individual right "to keep and bear Arms." The appropriate role of original intent in constitutional law, however, has been debated for the past two decades. In this Article, Farber illustrates how the Second Amendment exemplifies the classic, well-known criticisms of originalism. This does not prove, of course, that the conventional understanding of the Second Amendment should be retained. But, Farber concludes, advocates for a drastic expansion of Second Amendment rights will need something beyond the ambiguous historical record if they wish to show why, in today's world, gun rights warrant constitutional protection.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.