Direct Democracy and Article II: Additional Thoughts on Initiatives and Presidential Elections

Amar, Vikram David

Journal: UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Volume: 35

First Page: 631

Year: 2008

Bluebook Citation: 35 UC L. CONST. Q. 631 (2008)

Author: Vikram David Amar: all 40 publications


Abstract

This Article focuses on the first of the two questions in Professor Richard Hasen's aricle on whether "initiated changes to rules for choosing Presidential electors violate Article II." The article looks closely at places other than Article II where the Constitution uses the phrase "legislature of the States" and carefully examines Supreme Court cases on the topic. Given that initiative proponents are not necessarily foreclosed by the text of the Constitution, or Supreme Court case law, and given that initiative backers have some nineteenth and twentieth century history on their side, courts should be hesitant to invalidate all initiated changes to presidential selection procedures.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.