Design Matters: Modernizing the Federal Arbitration Act to Safeguard Party Autonomy

Cole, Sarah R.

Journal: Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volume: 27

First Page: 209

Year: 2025

Bluebook Citation: 27 CARDOZO J. CONFLICT RESOL. 209 (2025)

Author: Sarah Rudolph Cole: all 13 publications


Abstract

Arbitration is a creature of contract. And it is basic arbitration law that arbitrators must respect contracting parties’ intent. The Federal Arbitration Act’s 100th anniversary offers an ideal moment to reaffirm this principle: arbitrators resolving commercial disputes should honor parties’ intent while preserving arbitration’s core values: efficiency, finality, and autonomy. Unfortunately, routine judicial deference to arbitration decisions often undermines parties’ intent as expressed through party design of the arbitration process.

In response to this issue, this Article proposes amending the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) to empower courts to safeguard two common arbitral party directives: limits on arbitrators’ remedial authority and choice of law.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.