Defining and Valuing the Base of the Property Tax

Youngman, Joan M.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 58

First Page: 713

Year: 1983

Bluebook Citation: 58 WASH. L. REV. 713 (1983)

Author: Joan M. Youngman: all 1 publication


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

2
1
1
1980s2000s2010s

Courts citing this journal article

Wash.2
Conn. App. Ct.1
Or.1
Most recently cited by4
  • 2019Powell St. I, LLC v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor Or.
  • 2006Sun Valley Camping Cooperative, Inc. v. Town of Stafford Conn. App. Ct.
  • 1988Folsom v. County of Spokane Wash.
  • 1986Folsom v. County of Spokane Wash.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This article will consider the applicability of the "summation-of-interests" definition of property to the easement question generally, and will conclude that it is preferable to its alternatives in that context as well. The "summation-of-interests" definition in the easement context contradicts precedent established early in this century and accepted by a majority of jurisdictions. However, this precedent is based upon a number of logical errors: it equates property rights with property value, assumes that "property" must be defined as the rights retained by the owner of the fee, and sets the realizable sale price of the owner's interest as an upper limit upon "fair market value" for tax purposes. Finally, a concluding section will consider briefly the actual steps in the valuation process by which a new approach to the assessment of restricted property might be initiated.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.