Defending the Mentally Ill: A Discussion of Nebraska's Involuntary Commitment Proceedings
Hagel, Thomas L.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Most recently cited by1
- 1981State v. Blythman Neb.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
This article discusses various aspects of representing individuals who are allegedly "mentally ill and dangerous," under the provisions of the Nebraska Mental Health Commitment Act. The discussion deals primarily with the involuntary commitment of such individuals. Commitment of those accused or convicted of criminal offenses are only alluded to in passing, while voluntary admissions to a mental institution are not addressed. The purpose of this article is to discuss the various problems inherent in representing mentally ill individuals and to examine the legal and tactical aspects involved in the handling of such cases. I. Introduction II. Involuntary Commitment Procedure III. Applicability of Constitutional Law IV. Hearing Procedures V. Mental Illness VI. Prediction of Dangerousness VII. The Nexus Requirement VIII. Alternatives to Commitment IX. Post-Commitment Proceedings X. Conclusion