Defending the Mentally Ill: A Discussion of Nebraska's Involuntary Commitment Proceedings

Hagel, Thomas L.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 57

First Page: 1

Year: 1978

Bluebook Citation: 57 NEB. L. REV. 1 (1978)

Author: Thomas L. Hagel: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1981State v. Blythman Neb.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This article discusses various aspects of representing individuals who are allegedly "mentally ill and dangerous," under the provisions of the Nebraska Mental Health Commitment Act. The discussion deals primarily with the involuntary commitment of such individuals. Commitment of those accused or convicted of criminal offenses are only alluded to in passing, while voluntary admissions to a mental institution are not addressed. The purpose of this article is to discuss the various problems inherent in representing mentally ill individuals and to examine the legal and tactical aspects involved in the handling of such cases. I. Introduction II. Involuntary Commitment Procedure III. Applicability of Constitutional Law IV. Hearing Procedures V. Mental Illness VI. Prediction of Dangerousness VII. The Nexus Requirement VIII. Alternatives to Commitment IX. Post-Commitment Proceedings X. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.