Culture Matters: Cultural Differences in the Reporting of Employment Discrimination Claims

Kim, Andrew Tae-Hyun

Journal: William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Volume: 20

First Page: 405

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: 20 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 405 (2011)

Author: Andrew Tae-Hyun Kim: all 7 publications


Abstract

Why don’t reasonable people complain about discrimination? Behavioral science evidence points to structural barriers, like the fear of retaliation and the lack of sociocultural power in the workplace, that discourage employees from reporting. By not reporting perceived discriminatory or harassing conduct, the employee not only underutilizes Title VII’s administrative scheme—which was created precisely to remedy and deter such conduct—but also incurs a heavy litigative cost in employer liability suits. This Article claims that for certain minority groups, namely Asian Americans, certain cultural differences significantly heighten those structural barriers and consequently leave them underprotected in the legal system.

The Article locates the cultural differences in two dimensions of cultural diversity—collectivism and particularism—and a Confucian philosophical norm. Ultimately, it asks and addresses whether the law should accommodate these differences or whether the ethnic minority should accommodate, and thereby assimilate to, the legal norm. It concludes that courts should, as with certain gender differences, consider cultural differences when assessing the reasonableness of the employee’s actions in employer liability suits.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.