Criminal Procedure--Discovery-Right of Prosecution to Pre-trial Discovery

Dignan Jr., Thomas G.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 61

First Page: 987

Year: 1963

Bluebook Citation: 61 MICH. L. REV. 987 (1963)

Author: Thomas G. Dignan Jr: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by2
  • 1965El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior P.R.
  • 1965People v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico P.R.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In a trial for rape, the defendant indicated an intention to rely on his alleged impotency as a defense. The trial court thereupon granted the prosecution's motion for discovery of all medical reports and X-rays relating to the defendant's present physical condition, the names and addresses of all physicians who had treated the defendant prior to trial, and the names and addresses of all physicians who had been subpoenaed to testify for the defendant. On petition by the defendant, the intermediate appellate court issued a writ of prohibition restraining the enforcement of the trial court's order. On review, held, reversed, two judges dissenting in part.

The prosecution is entitled to discover information pertinent to evidence which the defendant intends to introduce in the nature of an exculpatory defense; such information does not fall within the scope of the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination. Jones v. Superior Court, 372 P.2d 919, 22 Cal. Rptr. 879 (1962).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.