Criminal Law Revision Codification vs. Piecemeal Amendment

Remington, Frank J.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 33

First Page: 396

Year: 1954

Bluebook Citation: 33 NEB. L. REV. 396 (1954)

Author: Frank J. Remington: all 13 publications


Abstract

I. Introduction This symposium issue of the Nebraska Law Review affords additional evidence of the growing interest in criminal law revision. Not only is there interest, but, more important, there are indications that steps are being taken to translate that interest into tangible contributions to the improvement of criminal justice, and particularly toward the improvement of the substantive criminal law which has for so long been ignored.1 It is with revision of the substantive statutory law that this article is primarily concerned. II. The Need for Revision … A. Obsolescence … B. Needless Verbosity C. … Needless Distinctions … D. Needless Overlapping … E. Inadequate Statement … F. Needless Penalty Variations III. Form of Revision … A. Piecemeal Amendment … B. Redrafting of Existing Statutes … C. Codification Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.