Creditors' Rights and Security Transactions -- 1962 Tennessee Survey

Lacey, Forrest W.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 16

First Page: 706

Year: 1963

Bluebook Citation: 16 VAND. L. REV. 706 (1963)

Author: Forrest W. Lacey: all 10 publications


Abstract

Tanner v. Mobley presented the problem of who may bring an action to recover usury. The plaintiff in the action, brought to recover usury and purge a trust deed and note of usury, was the daughter-in-law and grantee of the maker of the note and trust deed. The note and trust deed were executed in 1952. In 1954 the property covered by the trust deed was conveyed to plaintiff in consideration of her promise to pay the note and care for the grantor.

Plaintiff continued to make payments on the note for several years after the death of grantor in 1955. In affirming the action of the lower court in holding that plaintiff could not maintain the action, the court relied upon Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-1617 and several prior cases.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.