COURTS-MARTIAL--JURISDICTION OVER PERSON DISCHARGED AND RE-ENLISTED FOR OFFENSE COMMITTED DURING PRIOR ENLISTMENT

McLeod S.Ed., J. D.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 234

Year: 1949

Bluebook Citation: 48 MICH. L. REV. 234 (1949)

Author: John D. Mcleod S Ed: all 4 publications


Abstract

Petitioner, a chief petty officer in the Navy was honorably discharged on March 26, 1946, and re-enlisted on the following day. In 1947, he was tried by court-martial and convicted of cruelty, during his prior period-of service, to persons subject to his orders. The District Court sustained his writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the court-martial had no jurisdiction; the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. On certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, the court-martial had no jurisdiction to try petitioner for an offense committed prior to his discharge and re-enlistment.

United. States ex rel. Hirshberg v. Cooke, 336 U.S. 210, 69 S.Ct. 530 (1949).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.