CORPORATIONS-RECEIVERSHIP OR DISSOLUTION OF SOLVENT CORPORATION AT SUIT OF MINORITY STOCKHOLDER-DISSENSION AS A GROUND FOR RELIEF

Soller, Charles M.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 46

First Page: 836

Year: 1948

Bluebook Citation: 46 MICH. L. REV. 836 (1948)

Author: Charles M. Soller: all 3 publications


Abstract

A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the remaining 50 per cent. Y was president and director of each company, Z was secretary and director, and B was vice-president and director. A's testator had been treasurer and director until his death. A and B brought suit against Y and Z and the corporations, seeking an equity receivership and liquidation and distribution of corporate assets.

The complaint alleged that the two factions had been in dispute for five years, that Y had assumed exclusive control of corporate management and declined to discuss business policy with A and B, and that Y had refused to allow A representation on the boards of directors. The trial judge dismissed the bills of complaint on defendants' motion. Held, the complaints were properly dismissed. Equity has no power to administer a corporation or distribute its assets merely because of dissension among stockholders.

Dorf v. Hill Bus Co., (N.J. Err. & App. 1947) 54 A. (2d) 761.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.