Corporations—Merger—Lawful Business Purpose

Jaynes, Gordon L.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 28

First Page: 59

Year: 1953

Bluebook Citation: 28 WASH. L. REV. 59 (1953)

Author: Gordon L. Jaynes: all 3 publications


Abstract

P, a minority stockholder in Z Corp., voted against a proposed agreement between Z and X Corp., whereby the shareholders of Z, in consideration of payment of $100, were to grant an option for over eighteen months, to purchase all shares of Z. D, a principal stockholder and director in Z, organized Y Corp., in which D was principal stockholder and director. Y had an authorized capitalization including both common and redeemable preferred stock. The directors of Z and Y approved a merger agreement between the two corporations, wherein shareholders of Z received one share of redeemable preferred stock in Y for each of their shares of Z common. D gave all principal minority stockholders except P an option to purchase the same number of shares of common stock in Y as they had held in Z. The merger was approved by holders of two-thirds of the voting shares of Z, P only dissenting.

Y and X then entered an option agreement similar to the original proposal. P seeks to set aside the merger agreement. Judgment for D affirmed, Matteson v. Ziebarth, 40 Wn. 2d 286, 242 P. 2d 1025 (1952).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.