Corporations - De Facto Existence - Necessity of Good Faith Attempt to Incorporate Under and of Colorable Compliance with Incorporation Statute

Dailey, Richard R.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 53

First Page: 283

Year: 1954

Bluebook Citation: 53 MICH. L. REV. 283 (1954)

Author: Richard R. Dailey: all 7 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2005Rivera Hernández v. COMTEC Communication P.R. Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Defendant, a purported holding corporation, was organized in 1922 before the enactment of a state statute authorizing such corporations. The articles of incorporation stated that the purpose of the corporation was "to acquire, own and hold" shares of stock in a realty company. There was actual user of corporate power by the defendant under this attempted incorporation until the time of this suit in 1954. The legislature in 1941 amended the incorporation statute to authorize incorporation of a holding company, but no action was taken by the defendant pursuant to this amended statute.

In an action for a declaratory judgment, the minority stockholders of the realty company challenged the corporate existence of the defendant. The district court sustained a demurrer to the petition. On appeal, held, the defendant became a de facto corporation at the time of amendment of the incorporation statute in 1941 and its corporate existence was not now subject to collateral attack. Reversed on other grounds.

Baum v. Baum Holding Co., (Neb. 1954) 62 N.W. (2d) 864.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.