CORPORATIONS-APPRAISAL STATUTES-WHAT CONSTITUTES A WRITTEN OBJECTION TO CORPORATE MERGER SCHEME

Isaacson, Daniel A.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 525

Year: 1950

Bluebook Citation: 48 MICH. L. REV. 525 (1950)

Author: Daniel A. Isaacson: all 3 publications


Abstract

Plaintiff sent a letter to the president of a corporation, in which he held stock, revoking his proxy and stating that he would vote against a proposed merger with defendant corporation. Later, plaintiff demanded payment of the fair value of his shares pursuant to an appraisal statute which so permitted if a stockholder, dissatisfied with a merger plan," . . . objected thereto in writing . . . . " Held, the letter constituted a sufficient written objection for purposes of this statute. Wiswell v. General Waterworks Corporation, (Del.

Ch. 1949) 66 A. (2d) 424.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.