CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT AND THE COMBINATION PATENT

Eastman, Samuel Ewer

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 183

Year: 1949

Bluebook Citation: 48 MICH. L. REV. 183 (1949)

Author: Samuel Ewer Eastman: all 2 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The right of action for contributory infringement of a patent was forged by judicial legislation, and, as limited and subjected to opposing rules of law, has been tempered by that same process. The history is exemplary of the control over society exercisable by the courts according to their own individual economic outlook. In tracing this history, buying agreements, price-fixing, agreements not to deal in the goods of a competitor, conspiracies to restrain trade through licensing, and other business arrangements subject to scrutiny under the anti-trust laws will be dealt with only incidentally. It is not possible to deal only with combination patent cases in presenting a fair and accurate record of what has transpired.

But since that patent was instrumental in giving rise to the doctrine of contributory infringement, and has consequently suffered the most in its limitation, it will receive predominate treatment.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.