Contract Law and its Potential Impact on Parole and Probation Searches

Chmelar, Michael

Journal: Northern Illinois University Law Review

Volume: 28

First Page: 43

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 28 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 43 (2007)

Author: Michael Chmelar: all 1 publication


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

When considering a defendant's motion to reconsider his sentence or motion to reduce his sentence, Illinois courts apply principals of contract law to hold the defendant to his negotiated plea agreement. However, courts only utilize contract law to enforce the sentence length and not other material terms of a negotiated plea. Specifically, Illinois courts have not enforced search conditions in probation or parole orders when challenged through a motion to quash and suppress. The failure to extend the use of contract principals to the search term of a sentence could create a conflict with how courts enforce negotiated pleas.

In addition, a court's failure to uphold the search condition of a parole or probation term may have a negative impact on the State's willingness to enter into a plea agreement.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.