CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE INSTRUMENTS WHERE ADOPTED CHILDREN ARE CONCERNED: II

Oler, J. Wesley

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 43

First Page: 901

Year: 1945

Bluebook Citation: 43 MICH. L. REV. 901 (1945)

Author: J. Wesley Oler: all 7 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1950s1960s

Courts citing this journal article

Cuyahoga Cty. Prob. Ct.1
N.Y.1
Most recently cited by2

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Thus far in the discussion the attempt has been to consider a number of common terms of general designation, such as "children," "issue," and "heirs," detached from other language with which they may be found and disassociated from the circumstances under which they may be used, with a view to estimating their intrinsic significance in resolving questions as to the effect of adoption upon the identification of persons designated by them. The examination from this point: of view could lead to the deduction that in themselves the particular terms of designation furnished varying degrees of assistance to the interpreter of the instrument. It was not meant to suggest, however, that the particular words were in fact to be considered alone. True, courts now and then have ascribed an inherent finality to the meaning of one or more of these terms, in so far as they bear on the subject, but in the great percentage of instances it has been otherwise.

The backdrop of circumstance has been recognized. So has the context afforded by the rest of the instrument. As sometimes explicitly stated, the intention is to be gathered from the instrument as a whole.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.