Constitutional Law—Sodomy Statutes: The Question of Constitutionality: <i>Buchanan v. Batchelor</i>, 308 F. Supp. 729 (N.D. Tex. 1970)

Simmons, John F.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 50

First Page: 567

Year: 1971

Bluebook Citation: 50 NEB. L. REV. 567 (1971)

Author: John F. Simmons: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1973State v. Lair N.J.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Although the winds of change have created some ripples, the ancient crime of sodomy remains on the books in Nebraska and forty-six other states despite repeated attacks by commentators and renunciation by the Model Penal Code. Reinforced by Scripture and public sensibilities, sodomy statutes resisted constitutional attack until 1969, when the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in the case of Buchanan v. Batchelor found the Texas sodomy statute, essentially similar to those of almost all other jurisdictions, unconstitutional, and enjoined its enforcement. I. Introduction II. The Prelude to Buchanan III. The Buchanan Decision IV. Implications of Buchanan

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.