Constitutional Law—Obscenity: A Return to the First Amendment? <i>Stanley v. Georgia</i>, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)

Snowden, John R.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 49

First Page: 660

Year: 1970

Bluebook Citation: 49 NEB. L. REV. 660 (1970)

Author: John Rockwell Snowden: all 9 publications


Abstract

I. Introduction II. The First Amendment and Governmental Power to Repress Speech III. The Old Arguments and the Stanley Rationale … 1. Obscenity Is Simply Not Constitutionally Protected, and the State Is Free to Deal with It in Any Manner … 2. The State May Repress Obscene Expression to Protect Moral Standards … 3. The State May Suppress Obscenity in an Attempt to Control Deviant Sexual Behavior or Crimes of Sexual Violence … 4. The State May Regulate in the Interest of Preventing Unwilling Exposure to Obscenity [IV]. The Implications of the Stanley Rationale [V]. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.