CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FREEDOM OF THE PRESS - RESTRAINTS ON PUBLICATION

Culp, Maurice S.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 30

First Page: 279

Year: 1931

Bluebook Citation: 30 MICH. L. REV. 279 (1931)

Author: Maurice S. Culp: all 56 publications


Abstract

A recent Supreme Court decision establishes a new concept of freedom of the press, and adds new meaning to the liberty safeguarded by the Fourteenth Amendment. The defendant, Near, was enjoined from publishing his newspaper because it was alleged that the paper was largely devoted to the publication of malicious, scandalous, and defamatory articles about the grand jury, public officials, and others. The injunction was granted pursuant to a statute which made the publication of a malicious, scandalous, or defamatory newspaper, magazine, or periodical a nuisance subject to abatement by injunction. The Supreme Court of the United States decided that the statute violated the liberty of press guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and was invalid because it imposed a previous restraint upon publication equivalent to a censorship.

Four justices dissented.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.