Congressional Silence and the Statutory Interpretation Game

Stancil, Paul

Journal: William & Mary Law Review

Volume: 54

First Page: 1251

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 54 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1251 (2013)

Author: Paul J. Stancil: all 4 publications


Abstract

This Article explores the circumstances under which the federal legislative apparatus may be unable to respond to a politically objectionable statutory interpretation from the Supreme Court. The Article builds upon existing economic models of statutory interpretation, incorporating transaction costs into the analysis for the first time. The Article concludes by identifying recent real-world disputes in which transaction costs likely constrained Congress and the President from overriding the Court.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.