CONFLICT OF LAWS-FULL FAITH AND CREDIT-CUSTODY DECREES

Huston, James I.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 50

First Page: 602

Year: 1952

Bluebook Citation: 50 MICH. L. REV. 602 (1952)

Author: James I. Huston: all 3 publications


Abstract

Husband and wife, living in Ohio, were separated in 1945, the only child going to live with the paternal great-grandfather in Pennsylvania. Husband and wife were divorced in Ohio in April 1949. Custody of the child was awarded the wife, but because of the wife's defective vision the child was to remain temporarily with the great-grandfather; it was further provided that the custody question could be relitigated after eighteen months. On October 26, 1949, the wife got a further Ohio decree awarding her sole custody.

The great-grandfather refused to surrender the child, and wife filed a petition for habeas corpus in Pennsylvania, November 2, 1949. The Superior Court reversed the trial court and granted the writ. Held, reversed, two judges dissenting. The Ohio court did not have jurisdiction to make the custody decree of October 26, and therefore the decree need not be given full faith and credit in Pennsylvania.

Commonwealth ex rel. Graham v. Graham, 367 Pa. 553, 80 A (2d) 829 (1951).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.